Journal of

Decision Making and Communication with Authors
 

• The editor makes decisions on submitted manuscripts (accept, request revision, or reject) based on a thorough evaluation of the reviewers’ comments, the editor’s own assessment, and other relevant factors.
• When making a decision, several considerations are taken into account, including reviewers’ recommendations, available space within the journal, and most importantly, the editor’s judgment regarding the manuscript’s suitability, relevance, and potential value to readers. Additional reviews or expert opinions may be sought at the editor’s discretion.
• The editor communicates all final decisions directly to the authors. When necessary, the editor provides independent explanations for decisions, separate from the reviewers’ comments.
• Manuscripts may be rejected for various reasons, such as scientific weakness (poor research design or inappropriate methodology), lack of originality, limited relevance or interest to readers, or space constraints. The editor ensures that the reasons for rejection are clearly conveyed to the authors, especially in cases where reviewer comments appear favorable but the editorial decision is negative.
• Editors are encouraged to work constructively with authors whose papers are considered potentially acceptable. When revisions are requested, authors are informed which changes are essential and which are optional.
• If reviewers provide conflicting feedback, the editor determines which comments the authors should prioritize and communicates this clearly. Editors may also add their own remarks or suggestions to guide revisions. It is the responsibility of the editor, or an appointed member of the editorial office, to ensure that revised manuscripts comply with the journal’s standards and policies.