دوره 11، شماره 3 - ( 9-1402 )
جلد 11 شماره 3 صفحات 101-96 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Karimi Rouzbahani A, Mahmoudvand G, Nejad Shahrokh Abadi R, Yousofvand F, Mahmoudvand H, Sharifian M. Evaluation of the anatomical Position of the appendix in patients underwent appendectomy. J Surg Trauma 2023; 11 (3) :96-101
URL: http://jsurgery.bums.ac.ir/article-1-356-fa.html
URL: http://jsurgery.bums.ac.ir/article-1-356-fa.html
Evaluation of the anatomical Position of the appendix in patients underwent appendectomy. نشریه جراحی و تروما. 1402; 11 (3) :96-101
چکیده: (904 مشاهده)
- Introduction: The appendix is a narrow, worm-shaped tube that separates from the inner wall of the cecum. The length of the appendix varies from 2 to 20 cm, but on average it is 9 cm and can be placed in different positions. It seems essential to determine common positions of the appendix in different populations to reduce the risk of complications associated with surgical treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the position of the appendix in appendectomy patients referred to the General Surgery department of Shohada-e-Ashayer Hospital, Khorramabad, Iran, from 2016 to 2019.
- Method: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted on patients who underwent an appendectomy at Shohada-e-Ashayer Hospital, from 2016 to 2019. In this study, data including gender, age, appendix position, Body Mass Index (BMI), appendicitis pathology, and length of the appendix were collected from all patients referred to the hospital for an appendectomy. The collected information was entered into SPSS software (Version. 22) and analyzed using Chi-square and One-Way ANOVA tests at a 0.05 significance level.
- Results: This study was conducted on 222 appendectomy patients, of whom 128 patients (57.7%) were men and 94 (42.3%) were women. The mean age of the subjects was 28.32±14.84 years. The length of the appendix varied from 4.5 to 25 cm with an average length of 10.41±3.03cm. The most frequent position in the study population was the anterior position, which was observed in 112 subjects (50.45%), followed by the retro-cecal position in 95 (42.79%), and the para-cecal position in 15 patients (6.76%).
- Conclusion: In our study population, the anterior position was the most common appendix orientation. Also, a relatively high frequency of retro-cecal position was observed.
- View ORCID ID Profile
You can also search for this author in PubMed ResearchGate Scopus Google Scholar Google Scholar Profile
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي |
موضوع مقاله:
جراحی عمومی
دریافت: 1401/8/22 | پذیرش: 1402/7/15 | انتشار الکترونیک پیش از انتشار نهایی: 1402/9/10 | انتشار: 1402/12/22
دریافت: 1401/8/22 | پذیرش: 1402/7/15 | انتشار الکترونیک پیش از انتشار نهایی: 1402/9/10 | انتشار: 1402/12/22
فهرست منابع
1. Lamture YR, Salunke B. Anatomical variations related to position of appendix. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2018;7(46):5830-5834. [DOI:10.14260/jemds/2018/1119]
2. Ung C, Chang ST, Jeffrey RB, Patel BN, Olcott EW. Sonography of the normal appendix: its varied appearance and techniques to improve its visualization. Ultrasound Q. 2013;29(4):333-341. [DOI:10.1097/RUQ.0b013e3182a2aa8e] [PMID]
3. Benedetti LDL, Martínez JDL. Anatomical variations of caecal appendix on tomography, a retrospective study. Revista Ciencias Biomédicas. 2021;10(3):163-171. [DOI:10.32997/rcb-2021-3350]
4. Behary J, Hui JM. The caecal mucus sign. Gut. 2017:gutjnl-2016-313248. [DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313248] [PMID]
5. Cheng Y, Xiong X, Lu J, Wu S, Zhou R, Cheng N. Early versus delayed appendicectomy for appendiceal phlegmon or abscess. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017(6). [DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD011670.pub2] [PMID]
6. Marek V, Záhorec R, Durdík S. Acute appendicitis: Clinical anatomy of the new palpation sign. Clinical Anatomy. 2021;34(2):218-223. [DOI:10.1002/ca.23684] [PMID]
7. Snyder MJ, Guthrie M, Cagle Jr SD. Acute appendicitis: efficient diagnosis and management. Am fam physician. 2018;98(1):25-33.
8. Glass CC, Rangel SJ, editors. Overview and diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children. Elsevier. Seminars in pediatric surgery; 2016. [DOI:10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2016.05.001] [PMID]
9. Cameron DB, Williams R, Geng Y, Gosain A, Arnold MA, Guner YS, et al. Time to appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a systematic review. J Pediatr Surg. 2018;53(3):396-405. [DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.11.042] [PMID]
10. Bal A, Ozkececi ZT, Turkoglu O, Ozsoy M, Celep RB, Yilmaz S, et al. Demographic characteristics and seasonal variations of acute appendicitis. Ann Ital Chir. 2015;86:539-544.
11. Ghorbani A, Forouzesh M, Kazemifar AM. Variation in anatomical position of vermiform appendix among iranian population: an old issue which has not lost its importance. Anatomy research international. 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/313575 [DOI:10.1155/2014/313575] [PMID] []
12. El-Amin EI, Ahmed GY, Ahmed WAM, Khalid KE, Sakran AM. Lengths and positions of the vermiform appendix among Sudanese cadavers. AIMS Medical Science. 2015;2(3):222-227. [DOI:10.3934/medsci.2015.3.222]
13. Awayshih MMA, Nofal MN, Yousef AJ. Evaluation of Alvarado score in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Pan Afr Med J. 2019;34:15. [DOI:10.11604/pamj.2019.34.15.17803] [PMID] []
14. Stöß C, Nitsche U, Neumann P-A, Kehl V, Wilhelm D, Busse R, et al. Acute Appendicitis: Trends in Surgical Treatment: A Population-Based Study of Over 800 000 Patients. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021;118(14):244-249. [DOI:10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0118]
15. Alshammari FD, Oreiby HA, Ahmed HG, Alshaghdali K, Alcantara JC, Ahmed GME, et al. The common motives for appendectomy in Hail Region Saudi Arabia. AIMS Public Health. 2020;7(1):114-122. [DOI:10.3934/publichealth.2020011] [PMID] []
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
