دوره 11، شماره 2 - ( 5-1402 )
جلد 11 شماره 2 صفحات 58-50 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Gorjizadeh A, Asghari Y, Kamali Ahangar S, Zahedian A. Short-term outcomes of inguinal hernia Liechtenstein repair by using self-fixing progrip mesh in comparison with sutured prolene mesh: a clinical trial study. J Surg Trauma 2023; 11 (2) :50-58
URL: http://jsurgery.bums.ac.ir/article-1-323-fa.html
URL: http://jsurgery.bums.ac.ir/article-1-323-fa.html
Short-term outcomes of inguinal hernia Liechtenstein repair by using self-fixing progrip mesh in comparison with sutured prolene mesh: a clinical trial study. نشریه جراحی و تروما. 1402; 11 (2) :50-58
چکیده: (833 مشاهده)
- Introduction: Due to the high prevalence of inguinal hernia surgery and its impact on quality of life and workforce, it is necessary to find a method with the least complication and recurrence. Since the use of the progrip mesh clearly reduces the operating time and surgical site manipulation, it seems to be a good treatment option.
- Methods: This clinical trial study was performed on 80 patients with inguinal hernia repair candidates admitted to Beheshti and Rohani Hospitals in Babol, Iran. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. In the first group, the repair was done with progrip mesh, and in the second group, the prolene was restored. 4,8 and 12 hours after the operation, a checklist pain score based on VAS and EQ-5D-3L questionnaire was completed before surgery, 6 to 12 hours after surgery, and 24 hours after surgery for each patient. Data was analyzed using Chi-square, T-test, and the Mann-Whitney test. A significance level of (0.05) was considered.
- Results: The mean duration of operation in the progrip group was(31.15 ± 9.35)minutes and in the prolene group was(9.53 ±14.46) minutes, which was significantly shorter in the progrip group(p=0.048). Complications of surgery were not reported in any of the patients. The mean of pain intensity 4 hours after surgery in the progrip group was(5.04 ±1.05) and in the prolene group was(5.50 ±1.24), which was significantly lower in the progrip mesh group(p=0.048). The mean pain intensity was 8 hours(5.25 ±0.81versus 5.83±1.37)and was significantly lower in the progrip group(p=0.024). Also within 12 hours after was (3.38±1.23 versus 4.20±1.34) significantly lower in the progrip group(p=0.005).
- Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, the use of progrip mesh is associated with shortening the duration of the surgery and also reducing pain in postoperative patients.
View ORCID ID Profile
You can also search for this author in PubMed ResearchGate Scopus Google Scholar Google Scholar Profile
You can also search for this author in PubMed ResearchGate Scopus Google Scholar Google Scholar Profile
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي |
موضوع مقاله:
جراحی عمومی
دریافت: 1400/10/27 | پذیرش: 1402/3/28 | انتشار الکترونیک پیش از انتشار نهایی: 1402/4/9 | انتشار: 1402/5/27 | انتشار الکترونیک: 1402/5/27
دریافت: 1400/10/27 | پذیرش: 1402/3/28 | انتشار الکترونیک پیش از انتشار نهایی: 1402/4/9 | انتشار: 1402/5/27 | انتشار الکترونیک: 1402/5/27
فهرست منابع
1. Bittner R, Schwarz J. Inguinal hernia repair: current surgical techniques. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012;397(2):271-282. [DOI:10.1007/s00423-011-0875-7] [PMID]
2. Zhang W, Zhao Y, Shao X, Cheng T, Ji Z, Li J. Long-Term Follow-Up of Lichtenstein Repair of Inguinal Hernia in the Morbid Patients With Self-Gripping Mesh (Progrip(TM)). Front Surg. 2021;8:748880. [DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2021.748880] [PMID] []
3. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM. The tension-free hernioplasty. American journal of surgery. 1989;157(2):188-193. [DOI:10.1016/0002-9610(89)90526-6] [PMID]
4. Kingsnorth A, Gingell-Littlejohn M, Nienhuijs S, Schüle S, Appel P, Ziprin P, et al. Randomized controlled multicenter international clinical trial of self-gripping Parietex™ ProGrip™ polyester mesh versus lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: interim results at 3 months. Hernia. 2012;16(3):287-294. [DOI:10.1007/s10029-012-0900-y] [PMID]
5. Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2009;13(4):343-403. [DOI:10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7] [PMID] []
6. Douek M, Smith G, Oshowo A, Stoker DL, Wellwood JM. Prospective randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia mesh repair: five year follow up. BMJ. 2003;326(7397):1012-1013. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.326.7397.1012] [PMID] []
7. Fountain Y. The chronic pain policy coalition. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006;88(8):279. [DOI:10.1308/147363506X144015]
8. Takayama Y, Kaneoka Y, Maeda A, Takahashi T, Uji M. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair versus open mesh plug repair for bilateral primary inguinal hernia. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020;4(2):156-162. [DOI:10.1002/ags3.12314] [PMID] []
9. Fränneby U, Sandblom G, Nordin P, Nyrén O, Gunnarsson U. Risk factors for long-term pain after hernia surgery. Ann Surg. 2006;244(2):212-219. [DOI:10.1097/01.sla.0000218081.53940.01] [PMID] []
10. Schnyder F, Cabalzar-Wondberg D, Raptis DA, Eisner L, Zuber M, Weixler B. Outcome of open inguinal hernia repair using sutureless self-gripping mesh - a retrospective single cohort study. Swiss Med Wkly. 2021;151:20455. [DOI:10.4414/smw.2021.20455] [PMID]
11. Gonzalez R, Fugate K, McClusky D, Ritter E, Lederman A, Dillehay D. Relationship between tissue ingrowth and mesh contraction. World journal of surgery. 2005;29(8):1038-1043. [DOI:10.1007/s00268-005-7786-0] [PMID]
12. Bringman S, Heikkinen TJ, Wollert S, Osterberg J, Smedberg S, Granlund H, et al. Early results of a single-blinded, randomized, controlled, Internet-based multicenter trial comparing Prolene and Vypro II mesh in Lichtenstein hernioplasty. Hernia. 2004;8(2):127-134. [DOI:10.1007/s10029-003-0192-3] [PMID]
13. Bringman S, Wollert S, Osterberg J, Smedberg S, Granlund H, Heikkinen TJ. Three-year results of a randomized clinical trial of lightweight or standard polypropylene mesh in Lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernia. BJS. 2006;93(9):1056-1059. [DOI:10.1002/bjs.5403] [PMID]
14. Birk D, Hess S, Garcia-Pardo C. Low recurrence rate and low chronic pain associated with inguinal hernia repair by laparoscopic placement of Parietex ProGrip™ mesh: clinical outcomes of 220 hernias with mean follow-up at 23 months. Hernia. 2013;17(3):313-320. [DOI:10.1007/s10029-013-1053-3] [PMID]
15. Kaya A, Tutcu Şahin S, Kaya Y, Coşkun T, Sakarya A. Comparison of prolene and progrip meshes in inguinal hernia repair in terms of post-operative pain, limitation of movement and quality of life. Turk J Surg. 2020;36(1):48-52. [DOI:10.5578/turkjsurg.4451] [PMID] []
16. Bignell M, Partridge G, Mahon D, Rhodes M. Prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic (transabdominal preperitoneal-TAPP) versus open (mesh) repair for bilateral and recurrent inguinal hernia: incidence of chronic groin pain and impact on quality of life: results of 10 year follow-up. Hernia. 2012;16(6):635-640. [DOI:10.1007/s10029-012-0940-3] [PMID]
17. Pisanu A, Podda M, Saba A, Porceddu G, Uccheddu A. Meta-analysis and review of prospective randomized trials comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein techniques in recurrent inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 2015;19(3):355-366. [DOI:10.1007/s10029-014-1281-1] [PMID]
18. Nikkolo C, Lepner U. Chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair. Postgrad Med. 2016;128(1):69-75. [DOI:10.1080/00325481.2016.1121090] [PMID]
19. Burgmans JP, Voorbrood CE, Simmermacher RK, Schouten N, Smakman N, Clevers G, et al. Long-term Results of a Randomized Double-blinded Prospective Trial of a Lightweight (Ultrapro) Versus a Heavyweight Mesh (Prolene) in Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TULP-trial). Ann Surg. 2016;263(5):862-866. [DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000001579] [PMID]
20. Yilmaz A, Yener O, Kaynak B, Yiğitbaşi R, Demir M, Burcu B, et al. Self-gripping Covidien™ ProGrip™ mesh versus polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: multicenter short term results. Prague medical report. 2013;114(4):231-238. [DOI:10.14712/23362936.2014.12] [PMID]
21. Rönkä K, Vironen J, Kössi J, Hulmi T, Silvasti S, Hakala T, et al. Randomized Multicenter Trial Comparing Glue Fixation, Self-gripping Mesh, and Suture Fixation of Mesh in Lichtenstein Hernia Repair (FinnMesh Study). Ann Surg. 2015;262(5):714-719. [DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000001458] [PMID]
22. Li J, Ji Z, Li Y. The comparison of self-gripping mesh and sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: the results of meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2014;259(6):1080-1085. [DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000408] [PMID]
23. Pandanaboyana S, Mittapalli D, Rao A, Prasad R, Ahmad N. Meta-analysis of self-gripping mesh (Progrip) versus sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Surgeon. 2014;12(2):87-93. [DOI:10.1016/j.surge.2013.11.024] [PMID]
24. Fan JKM, Yip J, Foo DCC, Lo OSH, Law WL. Randomized trial comparing self gripping semi re-absorbable mesh (PROGRIP) with polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernioplasty: the 6 years result. Hernia. 2017;21(1):9-16. [DOI:10.1007/s10029-016-1545-z] [PMID]
25. Nikolova S, Harrison M, Sutton M. The Impact of Waiting Time on Health Gains from Surgery: Evidence from a National Patient-reported Outcome Dataset. Health economics. 2016;25(8):955-968. [DOI:10.1002/hec.3195] [PMID]
26. Zhang C, Li F, Zhang H, Zhong W, Shi D, Zhao Y. Self-gripping versus sutured mesh for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature. J Surg Res. 2013;185(2):653-660. [DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2013.07.035] [PMID]
27. Chastan P. Tension-free open hernia repair using an innovative self-gripping semi-resorbable mesh. Hernia. 2009;13(2):137-142. [DOI:10.1007/s10029-008-0451-4] [PMID]
28. Kapischke M, Schulze H, Caliebe A. Self-fixating mesh for the Lichtenstein procedure-a prestudy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010;395(4):317-322. [DOI:10.1007/s00423-010-0597-2] [PMID]
29. Sanders DL, Nienhuijs S, Ziprin P, Miserez M, Gingell-Littlejohn M, Smeds S. Randomized clinical trial comparing self-gripping mesh with suture fixation of lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2014;101(11):1373-1382. [DOI:10.1002/bjs.9598] [PMID]
30. Porrero JL, Castillo MJ, Pérez-Zapata A, Alonso MT, Cano-Valderrama O, Quirós E, et al. Randomised clinical trial: conventional Lichtenstein vs. hernioplasty with self-adhesive mesh in bilateral inguinal hernia surgery. Hernia. 2015;19(5):765-770. [DOI:10.1007/s10029-014-1316-7] [PMID]
31. Pierides G, Scheinin T, Remes V, Hermunen K, Vironen J. Randomized comparison of self-fixating and sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2012;99(5):630-636. [DOI:10.1002/bjs.8705] [PMID]
32. Batabyal P, Haddad RL, Samra JS, Wickins S, Sweeney E, Hugh TJ. Inguinal hernia repair with Parietex ProGrip mesh causes minimal discomfort and allows early return to normal activities. American journal of surgery. 2016;211(1):24-30. [DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.04.019] [PMID]
33. O'Dwyer PJ, Kingsnorth AN, Molloy RG, Small PK, Lammers B, Horeyseck G. Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2005;92(2):166-170. [DOI:10.1002/bjs.4833] [PMID]
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
