Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Afshari

Ali Afsharizade, Bahram Purseiedi, Zabihullah Mohaqiq, Siavash Kafian Atary, Payam Nikuian, Moein Najmaddini, Mohsen Najmaddini,
Volume 10, Issue 3 (7-2022)
Abstract

Introduction: A consistent concern of surgeons is postoperative pain, whose control both alleviates patient suffering and reduces surgical complications, resulting in a quicker discharge and lower costs. This study aimed to compare abdominal pain (epigastric and right-upper quadrant) and pain at umbilical and subxiphoid ports after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elective candidates at Afzalipour Medical Education Center, Kerman, Iran.
Methods: In this clinical trial, 76 candidates for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were assigned to one of two groups via a simple random allocation method. Gallbladders were removed from the subxiphoid port in the control group and the umbilical port in the case group. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the analgesic consumption was measured at 6 hours, 24 hours, and two weeks postoperatively. Data were analyzed by SPSS 16 software using independent t-test, chi-square, and repeated measures test.
Results: The mean port site pain score in the control group at 6 hours after surgery was 6.6±2.2, and in the case group, 6.3±1.9, and this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.519). The mean port pain score in the control group at 24 hours after surgery was 5.5±1.6 and in the control group was 4.9±1.1, where the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). The mean port site pain score in the control group two weeks after surgery was 0.6±4.1, while in the control group, it was 3.0±0.9, where the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01).
Conclusion: The results of our study demonstrated for the first time that there was no significant difference between patients whose gallbladder was removed through the umbilical port and those whose gallbladder was removed through the subxiphoid port concerning abdominal pain (epigastric and RUQ). Nevertheless, the removal of the gallbladder from the umbilical port 24 hours and two weeks after surgery reduced the patient’s port pain. This finding was evidenced descriptively by the VAS and quantitatively by the decline in analgesic prescriptions. Moreover, abdominal pain (epigastric and RUQ) was lower in patients with shorter operations.

Motahare Anvari, Naser Mohammadkarimi, Ali Raee, Mehdi Afshari, Mohamadali Jafari, Farzaneh Dehghan,
Volume 12, Issue 4 (12-2024)
Abstract

Introduction: Studies have shown that factors that distract the patient from pain, such as more pain in other parts of the body or the use of analgesics, can impair the process of fracture diagnosis by reducing the patient's sensitivity to the presence of tenderness during the doctor's examination. This study investigated the effect of using analgesics as a distracting item in patients with traumatic cervical pain and tenderness and determined whether prescribing and administering analgesics to these patients caused patients with noticeable bone lesions to be examined less accurately. It also explored whether the correct administration of analgesics reduces the use of radiography.
Methods: A total of 62 trauma patients with midline cervical pain who met at least one criterion for cervical CT scan imaging and required analgesics as diagnosed by the physician were included in this cross-sectional study. First, the patients' pain scores were measured and recorded according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) during the spinal examination. Subsequently, morphine at a dose of 0.05 mg/kg was administered intravenously. The pain scores of the patients were then recorded during the spinal examination at baseline and 30 minutes after administration. Subsequently, the patients were subjected to a CT scan of the cervical vertebrae, and the relationship between the pain score of the patients and the results of the CT scan was investigated.
Results: The mean pain score significantly decreased in patients with a normal condition (Not Presence of Fracture) after injection (P=0.004), but this difference was not significant in patients with a fractured spine, indicating that there was no improvement in pain with the administration of morphine in patients with serious cervical injuries (P=1.000).
Conclusion: In patients with cervical spine fractures, the administration of morphine did not completely alleviate the pain.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Surgery and Trauma

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb