Journal of

The detection of scientific misconduct may arise from reports submitted by co-authors, collaborators, peer reviewers, editors, or readers. Increasingly, cases are also identified through post-publication analyses, statistical forensics, and replication studies conducted by independent experts.

When an allegation of scientific misconduct—such as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism—is raised concerning a manuscript under review or one that has already been published, the journal editor is responsible for conducting a prompt, thorough, and confidential preliminary assessment. It is important to note that the editor does not conduct a formal investigation but ensures that appropriate procedures are followed.

The Journal of Surgery and Trauma adheres to the ethical and procedural guidelines established by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), World Association of Medical Editors (WAME), Council of Science Editors (CSE), and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). 

Upon receiving an allegation, the editor will:

1. Conduct a confidential preliminary assessment and request supporting documentation from the complainant.

2. If the allegation appears credible, contact the corresponding author in confidence to request an explanation.

3. Evaluate the author’s response as follows:
   ►If misconduct is admitted or verified, the editor will request a formal letter of explanation and retraction signed by the author(s) and notify the author’s institution.
   ►If the author’s explanation satisfactorily resolves the concern, the complainant will be informed that no misconduct was found.
   ►If the explanation is unsatisfactory or absent, the editor will refer the case to the relevant institutional authority (such as the dean, research integrity officer, or compliance office) for formal investigation and notify the author(s).

The formal investigation of alleged misconduct is the responsibility of the author’s institution, funding agency, or designated national authority. The journal expects timely acknowledgment and a clear investigation plan and timeline, typically within 60 days of notification.

Editors are required to maintain the highest level of confidentiality throughout the process, protecting the identity of all individuals involved. All communications with institutions and relevant authorities will be handled discreetly through secure or formally marked confidential correspondence.

If evidence suggests that the alleged misconduct affects publications in other journals, editors may communicate confidentially with their counterparts to coordinate an appropriate response.

This policy upholds the principles of integrity, fairness, and transparency in addressing allegations of misconduct, safeguarding the credibility of the Journal of Surgery and Trauma and the broader scientific community.