Article in Press
Back to the articles list |
Back to browse issues page
Mohsen Najmaddini 
, Mohammad sadegh Afzali sardu , Seydamalek Dadkhah , Mahboobe Doostkami , Ehsan Soltani , Fatemeh Shakhsemempour , Fidan Shabani , Mozhgan Bahramian , Maryam Bahramian , Seyyed Ebrahim Hosseini Zargaz *
, Mohammad sadegh Afzali sardu , Seydamalek Dadkhah , Mahboobe Doostkami , Ehsan Soltani , Fatemeh Shakhsemempour , Fidan Shabani , Mozhgan Bahramian , Maryam Bahramian , Seyyed Ebrahim Hosseini Zargaz *
Cardiovascular Diseases Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
Abstract: (14 Views)
Introduction: This study aimed to compare the effects of silver nitrate and sucralfate on the healing of second-degree burn wounds in burn patients at Imam Reza Hospital in Birjand.
Methods: This randomized controlled clinical trial was performed on 60 patients with second-degree burns. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: group A, which consisted of patients treated with a 0.5% silver nitrate dressing, and group B, which included those treated with a 10% sucralfate dressing. Initially, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to assess the normal distribution of the data. If the data were found to be normal, one-way analysis of variance and independent t-tests were employed. In the absence of normality, the Friedman and Mann-Whitney tests were used.
Results: Based on the findings, in the intervention group (B), 5 cases of bacterial colonization were positive, while 25 were negative. However, in the control group (A), 11 individuals had positive bacterial colonization. In both the intervention and control groups, the mean Bates-Jensen wound score on day 3 was significantly higher than on days 7 and 21 (p<0.001). Additionally, the mean Bates-Jensen wound score on day 7 was significantly higher compared to day 21 (p<0.001). In terms of pain score, the median score on day 3 was significantly higher than on days 7 and 21 (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Based on this study, the administration of 10% sucralfate, compared to the conventional approach, significantly enhanced wound healing.
Methods: This randomized controlled clinical trial was performed on 60 patients with second-degree burns. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: group A, which consisted of patients treated with a 0.5% silver nitrate dressing, and group B, which included those treated with a 10% sucralfate dressing. Initially, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to assess the normal distribution of the data. If the data were found to be normal, one-way analysis of variance and independent t-tests were employed. In the absence of normality, the Friedman and Mann-Whitney tests were used.
Results: Based on the findings, in the intervention group (B), 5 cases of bacterial colonization were positive, while 25 were negative. However, in the control group (A), 11 individuals had positive bacterial colonization. In both the intervention and control groups, the mean Bates-Jensen wound score on day 3 was significantly higher than on days 7 and 21 (p<0.001). Additionally, the mean Bates-Jensen wound score on day 7 was significantly higher compared to day 21 (p<0.001). In terms of pain score, the median score on day 3 was significantly higher than on days 7 and 21 (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Based on this study, the administration of 10% sucralfate, compared to the conventional approach, significantly enhanced wound healing.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Dermatology
Received: 2025/06/3 | Accepted: 2025/09/13 | ePublished ahead of print: 2025/10/8
Received: 2025/06/3 | Accepted: 2025/09/13 | ePublished ahead of print: 2025/10/8
References
1. Aghakhani N, Nia HS, Soleimani MA, Bahrami N, Rahbar N, Fattahi Y, et al. Prevalence burn injuries and risk factors in persons older the 15 years in Urmia burn center in Iran. Caspian J Intern Med. 2011;2(2):240-4.
2. Koç Z, Sağlam Z. Burn epidemiology and cost of medication in paediatric burn patients. Burns. 2012;38(6):813-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2012.03.011]
3. Sadeghi-Bazargani H, Mohammadi R. Epidemiology of burns in Iran during the last decade (2000-2010): review of literature and methodological considerations. Burns. 2012;38(3):319-29. [DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2011.09.025]
4. Peck MD. Epidemiology of burns throughout the World. Part II: intentional burns in adults. Burns. 2012;38(5):630-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2011.12.028]
5. Ahn CS, Maitz PK. The true cost of burn. Burns. 2012;38(7):967-74. [DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2012.05.016]
6. Koshariya M, Shitole A, Agarwal V, Dave S. Role of topical Sucralfate in healing of burn wounds. Int Surg J. 2018;5(9):2995. [DOI:10.18203/2349-2902.isj20183409]
7. Lumintang L, Adnyana MS, Riasa IN, Asmarajaya AA, Hamid AR, Sanjaya H. A systematic review: Topical sucralfate for burn wound. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2021;9(F):516-22. [DOI:10.3889/oamjms.2021.6253]
8. Badr P, Afsharypuor S, Tohidinik HR, Mohammadi AA, Daneshamouz S. Burn wound healing effect of a sterilized traditional formulation of Boswellia carteri vs. silver sulfadiazine cream 1% in patients presenting second-degree burn wounds: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Iran J Med Sci. 2023;48(2):137-45.
9. Godhi AS, Ram P, Powar R. Efficacy of topical sucralfate vERSUs silver sulfadiazine in the management of burns: A 1-year randomized controlled trial. J West Afr Coll Surg. 2017;7(1):57-70.
10. Gupta PJ, Heda PS, Kalaskar S, Tamaskar VP. Topical sucralfate decreases pain after hemorrhoidectomy and improves healing: a randomized, blinded, controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(2):231-4. [DOI:10.1007/s10350-007-9092-4]
11. Banati A, Chowdhury SR, Mazumder S. Topical use of sucralfate cream in second and third degree burns. Burns. 2001;27(5):465-9. [DOI:10.1016/S0305-4179(00)00165-0]
12. Shafigh MB, Baazm M, Choobineh H. Comparing effects of silver sulfadiazine, Sucralfate and Brassica oleracea extract on burn wound healing. Life Sci. 2013;10(6):852-61.
13. Beheshti A, Shafigh Y, Zangivand AA, Samiee-Rad F, Hassanzadeh G, Shafigh N. Comparison of topical sucralfate and silver sulfadiazine cream in second degree burns in rats. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2013;22(4):481-7.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Attribution-NoneCommercial CC BY-NC
